The RTX 3090 is here [ no life podcast ]


In this episode of No Life Podcast, the crew discuss the awesome new RTX 3000's series release announcement from Nvidia.

Subscribe to No Life Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, and any podcatcher out there!

Switch 2.0 // Red Komodo Sucks? [ no life podcast ]

Switch it Up / Komodo Sucks?

In this episode of the No Life Podcast, we discuss the rumors of a new Nintendo Switch. Then in tech Wayne and Jerry talk about the newly released Red Komodo.

Subscribe to No Life Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, and any podcatcher out there!

Epic vs Apple // Canon R5 Post-Review [ no life podcast ]

Doth Battle hath Beguneth

In this episode of No Life Podcast, we dig into the Post-Review of the Canon R5, where Wayne breaks down all his thoughts on the camera and who should purchase it. Later the crew debate the ethics of the Apple vs Epic debate. All this and much more on this episode.

Subscribe to No Life Podcast on iTunes, Spotify, and any podcatcher out there!

The Canon EOS R5: A (Nearly) Perfect Hybrid | No Life Review

It's been a wild ride. The Canon R5 has been one of the most controversial camera releases I personally have ever seen. It started well before the camera was even released. We all first started hearing murmurs of a new Canon body coming, with (what seem now like) modest specs such as uncropped 4K and a new IBIS system. Then one day revealed some information most of the internet passed off as bullshit. Specs like "8K recording with no crop", "8 stops of IBIS", "4K 120fps", "Internal 10-bit". These rumors set the camera community ablaze, with many putting Canonrumors' integrity under scrutiny. There was just no way Canon - a rather conservative camera company who have drug their feet into the mirrorless market - would release a camera that would cannibalize their top end DSLR's, and maybe even some of their cinema cameras.

But alas, we are here, and the camera is in fact real. All the specs were correct, adding another notch to Canonrumors belt and the tears of Panasonic, Fuji, & Sony fanboys everywhere flowed into a river of revenue for the Japanese company.

Canon R5 Specs

  • Price - $3,899.00
  • 45mp Full Frame Sensor
  • Digic X Processor (Same in 1DX mk III)
  • Up to 8EV Stops of IBIS (with RF OIS Lens)
  • Dual Pixel Autofocus - 5940 AF Points, with improved Eye-AF, and new Animal Eye AF
  • ISO 100-51200
  • 12fps Mechanical / 20fps Electronic Shutter
  • Fully Articulating 3.15in / 8cm Screen with 2.1m dot LCD
  • 5.76m dot OLED Viewfinder up to 120fps
  • 5Ghz & 2.4Ghz Wifi with Bluetooth 4.2
  • 738g - 1.63lbs
  • 1x CFExpress Type B slot with 1x UHS-II SD Card slot
  • 3.5mm Mic Jack and Headphone Jack
  • Micro HDMI 2.0 Port
  • USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 port with Power Delivery
  • Removal of "Swipe Bar" for Joystick

Video Recording Specs

  • 8K RAW (29.97/25/24/23.98p) - 2600 Mbps
  • 8K (29.97/25/24/23.98p) - ALL-I = 1300 Mbps / IPB = 470 Mbps
  • 4K (119.9/100p) - 1880 Mbps
  • 4K (59.94/50p) - ALL-I = 940Mbps / IPB = 230Mbps
  • 4K (29.97/25/24/23.98p) ALL-I = 470Mbps / IPB = 120Mbps
  • 1080 (59.94/50p) ALL-I = 180Mbps / IPB = 60Mbps
  • 1080 (29.97/25/24/23.98p) ALL-I = 90Mbps / IPB = 30Mbps
  • All modes available in C-LOG
  • C-LOG = 10-bit 4:2:2 H.265
  • All modes uncropped
  • All 4K modes up to 60p can be sent external with 10-bit 4:2:2 C-Log
  • 4K 120p allows Auto-Focus, but no audio and is resolved in camera to 29.97p

A New Canon

So as you can see, Canon has thrown the kitchen sink at the new flagship mirrorless camera. There seems to be nothing left behind...well, for the most part (we'll get to that). I find with the immense amount of options available in your hands, it's hard to pick up this camera and not be inspired to use it. And this is what I believe to be the R5's best asset. You're given a swath of options to ensure you can not only get the shot, but that the shot is going to look as good as can be. What I also think is important is that this camera release (along with the R6) seems to ignite the flames of a new Canon. A Canon that doesn't hold anything behind, something we haven't seen from the brand since possibly the 5Dmk II.

But this camera is not without its faults. What comes with a more adventurous company, unfortunately, comes with more instability. For many who are fond of the way Canon has carried themselves, they may not take kindly to this new risk-taking. Myself, because this is my review, I haven't been more excited for the future of the brand and their products. So now with all that said, let's get into the nitty gritty.

Handling & Ergonomics

As with many other Canon cameras, the handling and ergonomics are quite good. The first thing I noticed when picking up the camera is its weight. It does seem considerably heavier than the EOS R, and also feels substantially more "thick". Thicc, rather. While I wish it remained the same weight, I personally enjoy the thicker grip on the camera as it feels much more connected to my hand. Those with small hands may enjoy the slightly slimmer nature of the EOS R.

Some other little ergo upgrades include the addition of the joystick in place of the much hated "Multi-Swipe Bar". This brings that classic feel to a modern device. Instead of directional buttons on the R, you are given the 5d-like rotating gear which some may not prefer, but I personally do. There's also now a little notch on the ON/OFF switch for easy toggling. The Mic Jack is now positioned in a way that doesn't interfere with the screen at all. And weather sealing is much improved, with now the "grip port" positioned near the battery to allow less moisture entry.

All these slight little upgrades improve the already excellent handling. I do think there is some room for improvement. I would like a few more customizable buttons, as things do feel a bit sparse. I would also like more metal in the build - maybe aluminum - to increase heat dispersion but keep weight down. And lastly, Canon has done something I may never forgive them for. They removed the Mini HDMI and replaced it with the absolutely despised Micro HDMI port. This means you should expect to go through at least one Micro HDMI cable a week, thanks to how utter shit they are. Whoever invented the Micro HDMI should be put in the gallows, and Canon should be reprimanded forever for this terrible, terrible decision.


Now lets get into the meat of this review. The first thing I want to dive into is video. If you're looking at the R5, chances are you're looking to make use of the insane video specs that headlines this camera.


First off, you can expect some really great, high quality, 1080p. Many reviewers and content creators like to ignore 1080p, not realizing it's still the most popular resolution to shoot and view in. Well, I wanted to make sure that this camera's 45mp sensor did not hinder the 1080p to much. The 1080p is very crispy & clean. You can record 1080p all the way up to 60fps (oddly Canon has omitted 120fps in 1080p - though they did state it may be added in firmware in the future), and best of all you are now capable of recording 1080p in 10-bit C-Log 4:2:2. This difference in color space will be much more noticeable than a resolution when viewed on smaller devices like smartphones, so it's a huge advantage to have.


The 4K is where things get a bit more interesting. So there are many different modes in 4K. You're first met with a standard 4K mode, which heads up to 60p. This mode employs pixel binning and line-skipping to produce the 4K image. The 4K standard image has around 11 stops of dynamic range in 10-bit CLOG, and is a bit soft on the edges. You can also notice some light line-skipping in really fine, moving edges. It's not the cleanest nor sharpest 4K, but the added 10-bit allows you a much more color rich and accurate picture.

Now, if you're going to be using this camera without an external recorder, this is the mode you're most likely going to be shooting the most in. Through my testing, the image is very similar to the EOS R, with a slight boost in detail, and less "blocking" or "digital edge". The reason you're going to be in this mode the most is because this 4K mode does not overheat internally. So while there is a 30min software limit (I can't believe Canon still puts this limit in their cameras), you will not be limited by heat and can immediately record afterwards - indefinitely.

So you should get comfy with this mode. And while you do lose a some detail when compared to the incredible 4KHQ mode, as you'll see, you still gain a great looking 4K image that stacks up with many of today's 4K capable cameras. Therefore, I don't think you'll feel as if you're "missing out" by being limited mostly to this mode thanks to overheating. I own an external recorder and I find I still prefer using this mode mainly because of the ease of use and mobility.

So again, you won't feel as if you're "missing out" with this mode. And this alone - just the fact we get uncropped 4K up to 30fps, with 10-bit 4:2:2 C-Log internal on a Canon Mirrorless Body - is enough for the price of admission in my opinion. This is what I wanted from the EOS R, this is what I wanted from the A7III / A7RIV. This is exactly what I've been waiting for, for the last 6 years. And it's finally a reality here.

But wait...there's MORE!

4K Crop

So if that's not enough for you, don't worry. Things get even better. Next I want to talk about the "Crop Mode" that is offered. Because the sensor is so high in resolution, Canon was kind enough to offer a crop mode which crops into the sensor 1.6x and downsamples the 4K from a 5.1K sensor readout. This means you're getting a slightly sharper, more detailed image when compared to the standard 4K mode. This also enables you to get more out of your lenses, since now you can punch in, give each lens a second set of focal ranges.

And lastly, what's great about this mode, is that it also doesn't overheat! I found myself using Crop Mode specifically for getting that extra focal length - something I loved on the Sony's. There were multiple scenarios where I was using my RF 15-35mm, but I wanted a 50mm look and didn't have my other lens with me. Well no worry, Crop Mode is there to save the day, and the added boost in detail and clarity obviously is welcomed. The other time I can see myself using this mode is if I wanted to record for a long time, didn't need a FF image, and I needed that extra bit of detail in camera. A niche and rare occasion, but I'm happy the option exists.

4K 60p

Yes, that's correct. This camera is able to shoot Full-frame or APS-C 4K DCI or UHD, in 10-bit. This was something I wished for, but did not expect on a mirrorless Canon hybrid. But here it is!

This mode is excellent for shooting sports or fast moving action sequences, as well as for slowing down footage to 50% or 40% in a 30p / 24p timeline respectively. I've used this mode a ton already, and honestly utilize it more than 4K 120p, mainly because I find 50% more versatile. Along with this mode, you still can keep the Auto-Focus and IBIS allowing worry free slow or smooth motion. Unfortunately, it does utilize the line-skipped / binned technique found in the standard 4K. Nothing a bit of sharpening can't fix, but it does need to be stated there is no 4K HQ 60p.

Now, you can also crop in on this mode. However, I do not believe cropping in on 4K 60p produces a sharper, or downscaled image. I believe the camera still employs a binned read out. So the only advantage to using this mode in crop is to gain some extra length from your lens. Lastly, the worst aspect of this mode is that it does overheats internally, though not externally. So if you're thinking about fully recording a football game or soccer match, or capture a full event, then you'll need to do so externally. Now, I have found that using 4K 60p intermittently for B-Roll works rather well. Far better than 4K 120p. So if you plan on shooting 4K 30/24p for the majority of your shoot, and scattering in some 4K 60p B-roll, you'll have an easy time doing this for many hours. It's only when shooting exclusively in this mode, things start to get frustrating.

4K 120p

You read that correct. The Canon R5 shoots 4K in 120 frames per second! When this was seen on the rumored specs, we all laughed. But alas, it's true. Unfortunately, it's one of the most unreliable modes in the camera.

Some pros about the 4K 120 mode. One, it exists. Two, both IBIS and DPAF work in this mode, so no worry about manually focusing just to capture some super-slow-mo. A very welcomed addition. Three, yes it's also in 10-bit C-Log internally. So you can match the footage with any other high quality mode in the camera. Unfortunately, this is where the pros stop.

Speaking on the cons, the 4K 120p, much like 4K 60p, employs the same type of binning process that produces a slightly duller image when compared to the full 8K readout. Not much of a big deal, again a little sharpening can make a big difference. Another con is that no audio is recorded in this mode. Thirdly, it's not a true 120/100p - meaning the camera shoots in 120p NTSC 100p PAL, but conforms the footage in camera down to a 30p/25p file. So you can't conform to other framerates like 60p, 48p, 23.97p or any other framerate in post. So this is more similar to the S&Q mode in the Sony cameras in that respect. Another con is that the files are massive. At 1.9g per second, a simple 15 second clip can reach upwards of 30Gb. Very unruly files to work with. And lastly, this is a mode that overheats, and overheats quickly.

With my testing, I was able to shoot around 10-15 minutes of 4K 120p on any given day. Unfortunately, any usage of the camera prior to shooting this mode, eats into its time allotted. This gives you a very unreliable timeframe to work with. Meaning, say you're going out to a shoot, and you know you need exactly 15 minutes of B-Roll in 4K 120p. Well when you head out to the set, and start filming, taking pictures, using non-overheating modes, that timer starts to tick down. And depending on what type of use you were going through, you may only end up with 5 minutes of actual recording time. The reliability of those times is what I found most frustrating.

I'm willing to forgive this. I never expected this camera to have this mode - and it is awesome to have the option. Though, I think the temptation of shooting glorious 4K 120p may be too great for others, leading them down a path of frustration and disappointment.


Now on to the headline feature. 8K with 8K RAW internally recording. It's a fucking nutty feature to have on a camera of this size, and its ambition certainly comes at cost. Now, when I first started using this camera, I had absolutely no intention of using 8K. But after some time, I found its cropability to be extremely useful. Being able to zoom in 200%, and still conform to a 4K timeline, allows for some insane composition ideas that can be edited down in post. Also, utilizing 8K RAW gives you the most versatility in all aspects of the image.

Now of course, this comes at a massive price. 1.3Gbps in 8K, and an excruciating 2.6Gbps for 8K Raw. To me, this is quite unusable, and this alone has led me to barely ever venture into this mode. On top of that, this is also a mode that overheats the camera, possibly more quickly than any other. I was able to net a very inconsistent 10-15 minutes of recording. Enough for maybe one scene. But given its odd novelty use case, that should be fine for most. Again, I rather have the option, than not have it. But overall, the 8K is quite a novelty, and I don't recommend ever really using it - just because of how intensely it overheats the camera, which can lock you out of recording in a lot of modes.

Other Video Features

Now there are all your shooting modes. As you can see, there is not shortage of shooting options in this camera. Easily one of the most ambitious Canon cameras we've seen to date. They really left nothing behind. Now while not all modes work reliably, we mustn't forget the other features that pack onto those modes, that make shooting with this camera such a pleasure.

Of course, I want to first talk about internal 10-bit 4:2:2 C-Log. It seems as if we're finally starting to see 10-bit make its way to consumer hybrids. In the R5, enabling C-Log and the Neutral Profile gives us a log image with around 11 stops of dynamic range to work with, as well as an excellent color science that makes post products extremely easy.

On top of that, we get the IBIS. This is by far, the most exciting feature for me, and I think the cameras most underrated feature. Canon has been touting this new IBIS system for quite some time, and it's been a sore point in the previous cameras. Now it's finally here, and it was well worth the wait. I'll just come out and say it, I think the IBIS is easily the best out of any Full-Frame camera, and possibly out of any Camera. My time with this IBIS produces an image that just "floats", despite any shakiness, walking, or moving. Even pulling upwards to 105mm, the IBIS along with the OIS produces absolutely no visible shake allowing for an easy 5 stops, but possibly even the stated 8 stops. It's a feature that I miss the most when using other cameras, and this feature alone, increases the value of this camera over many others.

Of course, we now have the famous Animal Eye AF in video. This allows you to easily track animals, whether its dogs, cats, birds, even insects. As someone who shoots their dog more often than I shoot any other subject, it's a welcomed addition. I would imagine this to be particularly useful for birders. No longer needing to manually track the fast moving animal allows you to worry more on composition & exposure, than focus.

There's a litany of other features as well. When you're not shooting in 10-bit C-log, a few other options become available to you. First, we have HDR PQ mode, which enables an easy ready to display HDR image. There's also the option to shoot in Canon's profiles. You also have the ability to utilize the new "Clarity" slider. This seems to sharpen the image up in camera, but in a different way than compared to the "Sharpen" slider in C-Log. To put it simply, the new clarity slider acts the same way the clarity slider would work in Lightroom. So even when you're not shooting in that 10-bit format, you're still given enough features and options to get the absolute most out of your image.


Finally, we get to photography. I'm probably not the best person to look at for a photography review. My photos do not demand much from the camera. At least, not yet. My main photo camera before the R5 was the Sony A7R III. In terms of specs, very similar. However, in terms of performance, things are very clear. The R5 is possibly the best photography mirrorless camera on the market to date. Because it's packing a heavy 45mp CMOS Sensor, photos are tack sharp. Combine this with the R5's ability to shoot 12fps with its mechanical shutter and 20fps with the electronic shutter, and you have a powerhouse of a stills camera that's sure to catch almost anything in your crosshairs. It also helps that you can utilize in insanely quick CFExpress card to never run into buffer issues despite the most demanding shoots.

Dynamic Range is quite incredible on the photo side of things. I don't have absolute numbers or test results on this, but I find the dynamic range easily beats what you get out the EOS R, as well as my a7R III. I wouldn't be surprised if it were around 14 - 15 usable stops. On top of the Dynamic Range, the ISO and low light performance has really surprised me as well. I did not expect this camera, due to its high MP sensor, to resolve low light detail as well as it does. Overall, there's almost nothing to harp on in the photography mode.

Final Thoughts:

The Canon R5, in my opinion, is a (nearly) perfect hybrid camera. It's a camera that perfectly fits into my type of content creation and workflow. Now, if you're solely a videographer looking for a good handheld full-frame 4K video camera, this is not a camera I would recommend. In that sense, there's no reason in getting any other camera other than the Sony A7S III. If you're looking for a camera that can shoot 4K120 without issue, this is not a camera I would recommend. If you're someone who wants the capability of shooting great 4K 24/30p with great IBIS and AF, as well as top photography specs and image quality, and may dip into 4K60p from time to time, then this is the perfect camera for you. And if you're looking to shoot in 8K downsampled 4K, or want to shoot unlimited 4K60p, then I only recommend this camera if you plan to purchase an external recorder.

Now, if you are that hybrid shooter, who does want to invest into a Ninja to get the most out of this camera, you need to be wary you're adding much more to the cost of the camera. I'd say around $5100 total. This means you're reaching Cinema prices which are very hard to ignore. While I understand that most of us would prefer the usability and mobility of the SLR body, it does need to be noted you'll get much more reliability out of a Cine. So make sure you're very aware of the type of content you're creating.

All in all, I'm giving the Canon EOS R5 a

4 / 5

This is because it does everything else perfectly. Internal 10-bit 4:2:2 C-Log in all modes is a dream. It has the best AF system I've used, the best IBIS system I've used, some of the best ergonomics and menu structures. Some of the best lenses in the mirrorless game. The best photography specs and features in a camera to date. And the best 4K image quality I've ever seen. Unfortunately, the overheating issue is big enough to stain the "trust" in the camera. However, I have no doubt Canon will alleviate some of these issue in future firmware, which will then place this camera at a perfect score. Canon, you're so close to the "perfect" hybrid camera. Do yourself a favor, and get there!



Canon R5 + Atomos Ninja V Setup Tutorial for Nearly Unlimited 4KHQ Recording

The Canon R5 + Ninja V Rig

Now that everyone knows that using an Atomos Ninja V with the Canon EOS R5 unlocks the true potential of the camera, I've been asked by many to set up a tutorial showcasing how I set mine up, along with the settings needed to get nearly unlimited recording times. So above is the video where I explain all the gear you'll need, the settings to choose, and bugs to watch out for. Below are links to many of the products (some affiliate) I featured in this video. If you want to support No Life, using those links is a big help.



Now that we have all the ingredients, check out the video above to see how it's all put together. The main thing you want to know is that the CFExpress card seems to be the bottleneck. So you need to make sure that if you want to record 4KHQ or 4K60fps externally, without worry of overheating, you'll need to do it without the CFExpress card in the slot (I'm still testing to see if SD cards in the slot make a difference). Now that you've taken care of the heating limits, it's time to take care of the battery limits. So utilizing the Canon dummy battery with the Canon AC adapter will ensure your camera runs indefinitely on AC power. You can also use the Atomos Power Kit to run to wall power to it also runs indefinitely. Note, if you want a more mobile setup, you can use Canon batteries in the camera, as well as Sony batteries for the Atomos, without it affecting overheating. It's up to you whether you need to be mobile, or need to film uninterrupted for hours on end.


Lastly, we need to make sure our settings are correct. Again, all this is covered in the video. But to gain the highest quality 4K recording, you'll want to record in 4KHQ. After setting that up, make sure your Sound is set to manual, then turn on C-Log to gain the best dynamic range and get a flat image ready for grading. Last, but certainly not least, you'll want to make sure that your HDMI display setting is set to "Camera + Display" (this is featured in the video), and have overheat control turned off. It seems that these modes are bugged when shooting externally, and if you set this up incorrectly, you may limit your recording time, but also run into screen off/disconnection issues.

And that's it! You're ready to use your Canon R5 to record in that beautiful 10-bit C-Log, 4K downsampled from 8K shooting mode, without any worry of the camera overheating all thanks to the Atomos Ninja V. And best of all, because you're utilizing the power of the Atomos, you'll be shooting in ProRes h264, which is infinitely more easy to work with on modern PC's. And now the camera's weird limitiations are a thing of the past, and you can solely focus on capturing the story you want to tell, in the highest quality possible.

If this tutorial helped and you enjoyed the content, make sure to share it on your social media to spread the word about No Life. Also, if you have any questions, comments, or concerns, feel free to leave a comment below. And lastly, subscribe to the No Life Podcast, which airs live every Tuesday at 6:30pm est, to stay updated on the latest in tech, gaming, & culture. 



Get The Most Recording Time out of the Canon R5 - The No Life Canon R5 Overheating Test

So the rumors that dominated the headlines on the release of the Canon R5, is of course the talk of overheating. After Canon has released their numbers for internal overheating, we all wondered if they were mitigated by recording externally. Unfortunately, tests by Gerald Undone seemed to add another nail in the coffin


So first the bad news. Internally, it seems I'm getting around the same times as Gerald. In fact, my times are a bit more conservative. I've averaged and rounded down my numbers a bit. But none the less, the internal recording times are quite restricting.

In terms of Usability, this means how often can you expect to hit the internal numbers. "Completely unreliable" means you're really at the mercy of the camera. On a cold start, sure, you'll probably get those advertised numbers. But if you're actually using the camera, expect to see numbers similar to mine. "Reliable" meaning you should be OK, for the most part. "Completely reliable" meaning you'll never worry about it. 8K is completely unreliable. Don't ever go out with the intention of shooting 8K, you'll just be frustrated. 4K120 is also unreliable. One day I shot 30min of 4KHQ, and still was able to get around 15min of 4K120, another day I shot photos for an hour or so and got around 5 mins. This isn't too much of a big deal in my opinion, as long as you know you'll just be limited to short, short bursts of it. Which is what its use case is for the most part. Fortunately, 4K 60 is a bit more reliable in FF mode, especially compared to 4K60 Crop. But I find you don't gain that much image quality entering crop mode, so keep that in mind. And lastly, 4KHQ has the most amount of time, but you may find at 30fps, times fluctuate a bit more than you're comfortable with. Meaning, if you're going out and you need exactly 25min of 4KHQ footage, you may find yourself disappointed. But that's the bad news that everyone knows about.

I have great news, though. My current testing, with proof added to the video above, shows a much different story externally. The Canon R5 can record that beautiful 4KHQ up to 30fps, in 10-bit CLog, with DPAF, as well as the best in class IBIS, externally to a Ninja V recorder or any recorder like a PC to OBS, for upwards of 4 HOURS. Yes, that's correct. You can externally record 4KHQ up to 30fps and 4K60fps with almost no limits, no weird shut down issues, no screen blackouts, and no overheat control.

All you need to do is not put any CFExpress / SD cards in the camera, and ensure your camera screen is set to auto-off.

So I found this out by not inputting any cards in the camera. With no cards added to the camera, the overheating timer does not show up, and you still get the clean 10-bit 4KHQ image sent. I've tested this multiple times, and each time, I was not met with even an overheating warning after multiple hours of recording. This is a FAR different case than the original numbers Gerald Undone released, and completely opens up the camera to so many more situations and content creators. I'm also not saying Gerald's number are incorrect - they just don't tell the full story. Also, I've done this with a dummy battery as well as with the new Canon LP6H batteries inserted, and currently, the battery dies before any overheat warnings. So you DON'T have to use a dummy battery to get long-form external recording.

UPDATE (8/7/20): Setting the HDMI display only to the external monitor (not the dual screen option), and turning on "Overheat Control" seems to be bugged. This mode was giving me those "screen blackout / disconnection" issues. Setting your camera in this mode may also reduce your times from the times I've stated. I will update this if it is fixed in the future. 

UPDATE (8/11/20): A test by the user John Gress posted his test results. It showed that the screen being on the entire time overheated the camera in just 40min. I can confirm that the screen being on (the entire time), overheats the camera much much quicker. I did a test where I kept the display on auto-off, but every other minute, turned the camera screen on. This test got me a mere 30min before overheating. Another test I did allowed the camera to record externally, without the screen being on at all, and was able to reach over 2 hours before concluding the test. This leads me to believe the issue is software related.

How to use the Canon R5 (Firmware 1.0) to get the best Recording Times in 4KHQ Externally

  • Use a dummy battery. This will not only improve heat, but also give you much more recording time, as you are now no longer limited by battery
  • Remove the CFExpress & SD Cards. Since you are recording externally, there is no need to use these cards.
  • Ensure your camera is set to "HDMI Display - Camera & External". This mode is bugged, and if you set it to external only, you will end up with screen blackout / disconnection issues.
  • Ensure your camera screen is set to auto-off. Like in the update, YouTuber John Gress showed that the screen also plays a role in overheating - through software limitation. This may be fixed in future firmware.

What I think is happening is that the cards themselves play a much bigger role in triggering the overheating, than the processor or sensor. Maybe there is some type of card buffer that activates when the cards are inputted, and this triggers the overheating countdown timer. I'm not exactly sure what the case may be, all I know is that a simple firmware fix can clear all this up.

Now, in order for Canon to fix this issue, they need to be made aware of the problem. So I implore you (if you care about these cameras), send this video to Canon, send it to the other reviews, send it to others with the camera. I'm just a single point of contention in this entire discussion, so it'll be great for more data points.

Overall, from my current testing, I'm 100% confident in saying you will get no overheating issues in 4KHQ up to 30fps, and 4K60, when recording externally until around 4 hours. And then, only shutting down the camera for a few minutes should give you another few added hours. This is huge for indie filmmakers, documentaries, weddings, and many other content creators looking for a reliable 4K camera that can record for long periods of time. Just know you'll need to pick up an external recorder to do so.


If you happen to have the R5, I'd love to know what types of recording times you're getting, both internal and external. Leave your times below in the comments, and make sure to leave what modes you've shot in (4K, 4KHQ, 4K120, All-I or IPB, Crop mode, everything). 




Sakeesian Hotline // I Got the Canon R5 [ no life podcast ]

Will You Call the Sarkeesian Hotline?

In this episode of No Life Podcast, we take a look at Jason Schreiers new piece where he details how Blizzard employees leaked a document showcasing everyone's salary and the disparity between Blizzard Activision CEO Bobby Kotick. Then we dive into the Sony exclusive issue, and the new Gaming Industry Hotline for those who were harassed or troubled by crunch, set up by Anita Sarkeesian. Last, we look at Apple's new iMac's and Wayne talks all about his experience with the Canon R5.




Is the Canon R5 4K "Unusable?" | Testing 4K Modes & Atomos Ninja

Let's Put it to the Test!

Well the Canon R5 is here, and I'm ready to put it through its paces. One of the things I wanted to know about this camera was its "4K NON-HQ" video recording mode. You see, the biggest criticism pointed at the R5 is its proclivity to overheat. Canon states the camera overheats at 8K, 4K HQ which is 4K downsampled from the 8K sensor, 4K 60fps, and 4K 120fps. But the camera doesn't overheat in the full-frame 4K lineskipped/binned mode at 24, 25, & 30fps. This means this is the preferred recording setting for most videographers with this camera - because you no longer need to worry about the oppressive, and variable, overheating times in the other modes. With that being said, I wanted to know how good, or how bad, the "Low Quality" 4K really is. So I put it to the test!


After watching the video, I think it's clear there is a noticeable difference in image quality between the downsampled 4K, and the "Low Quality" 4K. The image coming out of the 4KHQ is so god damn crisp and detailed. It's easily some of the best 4K seen out of a small mirrorless hybrid. Easily. But the 4KLQ isn't too far behind. Comparing the two images, the LQ is only a bit softer and a bit less detailed. You don't lose any dynamic range, you don't lose any motion data, you don't lose color data. You just get a softer image, when compared against the BEST 4K on the market. There is, however, some noticeable aliasing or line-skipping, that you can see on my glasses at 100% scale - which may be the biggest criticism. But we are really pixel peeping here, and for the most part, the differences between the two are negligible.

I also decided to contrast the two modes externally with the Atomos Ninja V. Here, we can see pretty much the same story. Unfortunately, the addition of the Ninja doesn't help increase the available recording time in 4KHQ too much, only giving about another 30 minutes before the camera overheats and needs almost 2 hours before completely cooling down. That said, utilizing a Ninja will allow you to record in 10-bit without needing to utilize the hard-to-render H265 video codec.

Finally, I think the Canon R5's "Low Quality" 4K is not "Low Quality" at all, or what Tony Northrup called "unusable". In fact, I think it looks great! If you found the 4K quality coming out of the older EOS R to be adequate, you will be very happy with the 4K quality coming out of the R5. It's nearly identical, except now you have true full-frame with no crop, as well as the added 10-bit with internal recording. I think most people will be very happy with this upgrade.


The ONLY Way to Cool the Canon R5 & R6

No, Not a Leafblower...

The Canon R5 & R6 are hot, hot, hot! Literally. If you've been following the world of videography and photography, you'll know the latest releases from Canon have brought up a ton of controversy, mainly due to the camera's thermal limitations. It's very reminiscent of earlier Apple laptops, which were criticized for not allowing manageable thermals. Now, regardless of the thermal limitations, it's still the camera I'm going to be picking up (in fact, I'm going with an R5 over the R6 and I'll explain why once the camera gets in). But with this added controversy has come a wave of opportunists. Camera accessory company Tilta is already jumping on the train and offering an active cooling fan that slaps right on the back of the Canon R5, to try and mitigate the heat.



Now from the images provided by Tilta, we can see they're claiming a "Maximum Temp Reduction of 82F". I'm not sure if this means that the camera can disperse 82F temps, or it can only manage 82F temps - I think it's left unclear and vauge for a reason. But I'm more interested in seeing if the product works at all. Mainly because we know the overheating deals with the phsyical sensor itself. The sensor builds up too much heat, and to evade damage, it limits itself. In other words, it's not like the camera's processor overheats like what we see in computers. This would mean, unless the sensor is connected to the body of the camera, which it's not since there is an IBIS motor built in, this fan would do very little work. Don't believe me? Well watch Armando's recent video where you see him using leafblowers on the camera, and later in which he states they did almost nothing.

A Real Solution

So unless Tilta is working some real magic (which who knows, maybe it does work and make a difference), I don't see this type of cooling method working. However, recent reports from show a new patent that displays an active RF mount cooler. This, by far, make much more sense. In the patent, you can see how the fan or active cooler sits behind the lens and in front of the sensor. This direct connection to the sensor would surely reduce temperatures, much more so than literally any method short of watercooling. Not only this, but it also enables the camera to keep its watersealing. This is PERFECT in my case, where I want a watersealed body some days, and other days, a fully fledged cinema rig. If something like this were to release, I think it would make the R5/R6 so much more appealing to many. There are almost no downsides to this type of cooling method.




Why I Preordered the Canon R6 over the R5 (& Why You Might Wanna Too)

Canon R5 & R6 Are the Grails We've Waited For!

In the video above I discuss the new R5 & R6 releases from Canon. To me, both of these cameras offer all my needs wrapped up in one body, and at reasonable price points! First off, I've shot with Canon as my first foray into shooting. But around the time I was jumping into video shooting, 4K was becoming more apparent. It was still "bleeding edge" but something of a reality. The only cameras offering this was Sony at the time, and so I moved to the Sony ecosystem. Since then I've been a fully embedded Sony shooter, owning an a6000, a6300, a7s2, RX100mk3, RX100mk4, and I still use my Sony a7r3 as my main high MP photo camera and video B-cam. I own countless lenses from Sony and Sigma, and a swath of accessories. I've loved my time with Sony, but I've always wanted more. Having a weak IBIS system, an OK color science, only 4:2:0 8-bit, and no flip-screen, has left me with a hole in my camera needs. I ended up picking up a Canon EOS R because I was happy Canon was moving to mirrorless, and I wanted a camera with great usability and flip out screen. I quickly found myself using the EOS R as my main A camera. Of course, this camera has also come with its own limitations. Massive 4K crop and lack of IBIS being the main issues.

canon-r6But then the R5 was leaked. It seemed to pack everything I wanted in a camera. Canon's excellent usability and body design, with top tier Sony-like specs and no crops. It sounded too good to be true. But when I heard about the Canon R6, I knew that would've been the camera for me. Fast forward till now, and both are announced. The R5's headline features are 4k120p and 8k 30fps RAW. This is on top of the INSANE specs like oversampled 4K 10-bit 4:2:2 internal, a brand new insanely good IBIS, best in class AF, C-log, and the return to the joystick. The perfect camera with added specs to help push along the industry. All this under $4000. It does seem however, the R5 isn't the "perfect camera". Documents from Canon showing the camera's top modes like the oversampled 4K, 4K120, and 8K all suffer from overheating. This has left a big stain on the legacy of this camera. As a Sony shooter, I've had enough of overheating. So this was some upsetting news.

from EOSHD / CVP

However, Canon did the best thing they done in years, and released the R6 with almost all the same specs - minus 4K120 and 8K. You still get 4K60fps, you still get the IBIS, you still get 10-bit 4:2:2 internal in all modes, there is no crop of course, you still get best in class AF, you still get the flipscreen, and you still get C-Log, you still get USB-C 3.1 gen 2  features like charging/powering/data transfer. All at almost half the price. Not too mention, it doesn't utilize the insanely expensive Cfast Express storage format, and takes regular-old SD cards. Now, one of the biggest "cripples" of this camera was that all modes only had IPB recording modes. This limits the bitrate to a much more compressed state. While the difference between IPB and ALL-I is negligible, it does make a difference. But this newly revitalized Canon has recently come out to say they will be adding ALL-I to all modes in a firmware update! Incredible news! This means the only true sacrifice (for myself) is losing 4K120p. Which is a huge feature, but not one that I'm willing to trade reliability and double the price for. Not yet at least. Finally, this tweet by Gerald Undone sums up my feelings on the R6 perfectly.

The Canon R6 is a much better value for the money. Utilizing 4K60 Prores with an Atomos, eliminating any overheating issues, while also utilizing an oversampled sensor and using SSD's / SD's over CFExpress, make this camera truly one of the most versatile and impressive mirrorless hybrids we've seen to date. It's been the camera I've been waiting for since the Sony A7S2. And speaking of Sony, the news coming from A7S3 sound really promising. These two companies back to competing neck and neck with eachother for the top spot has brought some excitement back into the ILC market, which we haven't had in a long, long time. So I'm pumped to get my hands on the new R6, and I'll be sure to post up my review once I've fully messed with the camera. Shipping says it won't be here until September, so we have quite the wait.